Skip to main content

Review: Smoke and Mirrors by Neil Gaiman – In which smoke causes me to break a mirror

Collection: Supernatural, Fantasy.

 I love short stories. The first collection of short stories that I ever owned was by Richard Matheson, and the first short story that I read from that collection was "Terror at 20,000 feet" because how much of a Twilight Zone fan I am.

Needless to say, I was hooked. From that day forth, I love short stories. Little bundles of information, a cool concept not worn out by the length of a novel, or an interesting character that we won't grow to become tired of because the story is too long.

No, a short story is beautiful at its core, and Matheson, primarily a horror writer, great at crafting a simple and short story, which how's off horror but doesn't overstay it's welcome like most horror movies and books.

Neil Gaiman knows how to tell a good short story. Take an idea that is interesting but will only last so long and craft a great story out of it? Check. The first story in the collection is incredible at exploring a large pond of ideas but still keeping everything in a neat ball.

Cover a multitude of genres and subjects in your collection? Check. One story has horror elements, another has romance, and yet another is just a cool story which can't really be classified. That's what a short story collection should be.

Use different perspectives, settings, and atmosphere to make each story its own experience? Check. Gaiman takes full advantage of the character and situation rollout. 

I highly suggest you pick this book up or do so once you have finished what you're reading now. Because you won't have time for anything else.

I rate it Good - Brilliant (If this is the first post of mine that you've read then this chart will explain how I rate books = Awful - Bad - Good - Great - Brilliant.) Some stories strike better than others, but all of them are good.

If you are interested in short story collections then check out my post on Kurt Vonnegut, if you are also a Matheson fan then post a comment below and take a look at my review of "A stir of echoes" some of Matheson’s less famous work I believe.

Thank you for reading and have a nice day!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Borrasca by C. K. Walker (Bourasca? Borraskwa?! ¿¿Boruscka??)

Novel: Thriller, horror. Contains violence and disturbing imagery.  Warning: This review contains minor spoilers.             Do you like tragic thrillers, bordering on horror? Stories which seem like they originate from the pits of humanity which we do not understand and do not wish to? Small towns with big secrets? Twists that you know are coming from a mile away, but find yourself too surrounded by fog to know the nature of this twist until it is footsteps are right upon you and your heart is tearing to get out of your rib cage???             If any of these apply to you (or god forbid, them all), then Borrasca may just be the book for you.             The book starts out with the old “I’m moving to a small town because of my dad/mom’s new job. Of course, in this book, the change of job is a lot more...
Post a Comment
Read more

Observation: Sins Forgotten

NOTE: This was written some time ago by yours truly.             The Seven Deadly sins are a staple of our culture.             Everyone knows of Greed, Envy, Gluttony, Sloth, Wrath, Lust, and Pride, and tries to avoid them. We fight these impulses daily and generally act as though they define all forms of evil, in one way or the other.             Thus, I find it ironic that the forgotten sin, Vainglory, is more prominent in this day and age than all others, and I intend to identify why this sin was forgotten and why it is important that they should be remembered.               Vainglory originates from Middle English and Medieval Latin, in Western Europe. It means “to boast in vain” or to be ostentatious about one’s own abilities. So why should it be re...
Post a Comment
Read more

Writing Advice: Certainty

There is no “seeming” or any synonym thereof in writing. There is no “he began to peddle” or “she started to yield.” Unless something has stopped your characters in the process of doing something, then you are direct. “He peddled” and “She yielded.” Anything less is robbing the readers of excitement. Things do not “seem” in your story, and if they do, they must only do so if you want to create uncertainty. Yes, there is hesitation in real life, but your story should not be real life. If your story is to be as depressing as real life, it should because the character tried and failed, not that they never tried to begin with.
Post a Comment
Read more