Skip to main content

What is wrong with 13 Reasons Why (and why you shouldn't watch it) - Season 1 spoilers

When this TV series first debuted, I found myself instantly disliking it, mostly because of the dialogue. I saw it weak from a story perspective, with a plot that was unfathomably drawn out and some very poor performances. My mother and some of my siblings binged the whole season, and I can to some extent understand why. The shows ability to be honest regarding how some people view sexual assault, rape, and suicide, was I think what drew attention in the first place.
            That said, and this is in no means an attack on those who enjoyed the first season or the second (which I refuse to watch, as there should never have been thirteen episodes of this show, let alone two seasons) it is a well-dressed piece of garbage.
            The acting is not strong enough to carry the weight of the subjects, the leads are boring at best and aside from a couple moments, the villains are cartoonish. The pacing is ruined by the length of the episodes and the number of them. We spend ten minutes each episode, with Troy hounding someone and asking them about Hannah, them refusing to talk to him, and him finding out the truth. It doesn’t even make any sense when there’s a good character who knows what happened and could tell Troy everything but refuses to. Many of the “reasons” aren’t even that bad or seem just thrown in there, without being truly connected to the tragic events later in the season.
While it dives headfirst into heavy subjects, the writing is like driftwood, floating along the surface of a deep, dark ocean. The writing displays no ambition for probing those depths. It skims the surface of every subject it can, systematic misogyny, mental illness, bullying, suicide, grief, but it doesn’t bring us to any kind of realization. It doesn’t have an epiphany waiting, there’s no realization, and there’s no attempt to have a meaningful discussion about these subjects because the characters are so two-dimensional.
There’s a scene, where one of the “bad guys” tells all the other “bad guys” what their problems is, individually. IT HAS NO SUBTLETY. IT’S TREATING ITS AUDIENCE LIKE THEY ARE IDIOTS.
But the worst thing about this show, the reason why it is so bad, is because it exemplifies every trope about high school and high schoolers that I know. The whole thing has cardboard cutout characters in a cardboard cutout world, trying to talk about real, painful problems in the world. Oh look, the jocks are sexist assholes who can get away with anything! Oh look, the cheerleaders are bullying someone! And what’s this? Why, the lonely, thoughtful teenagers are the good guys, because they’re keeping it real when everyone else is obsessed with popularity! Except for the really bullied kid, because he’s ready to shoot up a school.
The teenagers are like the breakfast bunch, without the character development. The adults are the stereotypes that teenagers think of when they imagine that adults don’t understand what they are going through. The subject matter is a way too sensitive and important, for you, the writer to be slacking off with this lazy world-building. If you want to be blunt about suicide and rape, fine. But you have your plot revolve around stereotypes that were passé in a Disney channel sitcom ten years ago.
It's puerile, edgy, angsty trash. And I know that because I wrote puerile, edgy, angsty trash when I was younger and in a worse mental state. And that would be fine, it would be fine if the show was just trashy. But you can’t mix heavy subjects with such sub-par storytelling because it insults the victims of those issues. You have to try harder than that if you want to talk about these things because it is painful to depict them alongside such empty characters.
The only good thing about season 1 of the show, was that the music choices were sometimes okay if you are into thoughtful indie rock like I am. And I like bikes.

But please let this show die after the third season. Its little more than a soulless cash-grab based on the exploitation of romanticized teenage angst. And that’s horrible. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Borrasca by C. K. Walker (Bourasca? Borraskwa?! ¿¿Boruscka??)

Novel: Thriller, horror. Contains violence and disturbing imagery.  Warning: This review contains minor spoilers.             Do you like tragic thrillers, bordering on horror? Stories which seem like they originate from the pits of humanity which we do not understand and do not wish to? Small towns with big secrets? Twists that you know are coming from a mile away, but find yourself too surrounded by fog to know the nature of this twist until it is footsteps are right upon you and your heart is tearing to get out of your rib cage???             If any of these apply to you (or god forbid, them all), then Borrasca may just be the book for you.             The book starts out with the old “I’m moving to a small town because of my dad/mom’s new job. Of course, in this book, the change of job is a lot more...

Review: Zen in the art of writing by Ray Bradbury – The literary equivalent of getting high

Ray Bradbury is my favorite writer. I love his short stories, his novels, his poems, and Fahrenheit 451 is my favorite book of all time. I wanted a book that would make me a better writer but would not be boring and tedious. So when I found out that there was a book by him, about writing, I decided that I had to have it. I had looked up some good books about writing and the moment I saw the name Bradbury I clicked on it. I scrolled through a list of quotes from the book and was fascinated, there are many great quotes from the book, and each one seemed to have life energy and being to them. So after reading only several quotes from the list I became very hyped for the book. And I was not disappointed because Bradbury writes with enthusiasm and honesty. While starting the first two chapters I became so enwrapped with the book that I went outside and began yelling the words out like a preacher quoting the bible (I was not drunk at the time, I was just very happy and really I’m j...

“Who Could That Be At This Hour?” By Lemony Snicket, in which Lemony sneaks around at too late of an hour

BE ADVISED! Along with containing minor spoilers, this review will be less about the book itself and more about the series of All The Wrong Questions and what it accomplishes and what it fails.  When I was around twelve or thirteen I first picked up “Who could that be at this hour?” It instantly captured my imagination with its air of intrigue and fascinating, semi-surreal setting. I grew up with the previous serious in the Lemony Snicketverse, “A Series of Unfortunate Events” and I hadn’t yet discovered my love of noir films so many of the tropes at play were initially lost on me. Looking back, older and more mature, I can see the seams. Already in the first book of a series of four, I can see the moments where the story lags. Having read all four books, I can see that while Handler is a master of delivering a powerful and clever satire, he doesn’t know how to break his own routines. It’s less noticeable in the first book than it is in later entries, but we are alrea...